Chapter 1: Freak Out!
Chapter 2: Lumpy Gravy
Chapter 3: We're Only In It For The Money]
Chapter 4: Cruising With Ruben and the Jets
Chapter 5: Burnt Weeny Sandwich
Chapter 6: Weasels Ripped My Flesh
Chapter 7: Chunga's Revenge
Chapter 8: Just Another Band From LA
Chapter 9: Roxy & Elsewhere
Chapter 10: Zoot Allures
Chapter 11: Lather and Related Albums
Chapter 12: The Shut Up 'N Play Yer Guitar Series
Chapter 13: The Man From Utopia]
Chapter 14: Frank Zappa Meets the Mothers of Prevention
Some thank-yous are in order, first to Zappologist Vladimir Sovetov,
who suggested that I concoct this site. Check out ARF, his own Zappa domain.
Thanks are also due to my old friend Adam Trionfo for initially
helping me excavate modern telecommunications and giving me an Amiga 2500.
Finally, I'd like to thank Zappologist Fredrik Johansson, whose sharp
eyes caught a few mistakes. He was especially helpful with the Weasels Ripped
My Flesh and Roxy & Elsewhere chapters.
I know I said "finally" up there, but Zappologist Michael Howard has my
thanks for his enlightening points in our e-mail conversations. (The
material in Zappology: The Closest Look At the Music and Lyrics of Frank
Zappa is copyrighted (C)2001 by Chris Federico.)
Words on Music?
Zappa stated many times that his primary goal
was to entertain -- that no matter how seriously he handled compositional
nuances, how minutely he expounded upon lyrical themes or how badly he wanted to
promote independent thinking, pleasure for himself and his listeners was the
chief motive.
Can the new listener be entertained by Zappa's
music without a thick exegesis like this one? Of course. Will the entertainment
of both way-back fanatics and new initiates be enhanced and the music put into a
more tangible perspective with a book like this? Yup. Frank's library of
gamut-running (and -breaking) music is the only one I know of that can be
immediately augmented by a big book. But the benefit's feasible only if the text
is based on research rather than guesswork, the music addressed solely, bereft
of comparisons with the work of other artists. Such comparisons aren't apples
vs. oranges; they're apples vs. tiny bits of apples.
This by-product of some brilliant music is here
for your entertainment. If it solves little puzzles for you or enchances your
enjoyment of the material it deals with, awreety-awrighty.
Enjoy. (I did.)
CF
Notes To the Reader and Pseudo-Bibliography
The essential introduction to Frank's view of
his own compositions would be his own The Real Frank Zappa Book (w/ Peter
Occhiogrosso, (C)1989, Poseidon Press). Therein is a lot of entertaining,
illuminating stuff, written in Frank's comfortable, funny, no-bullshit manner.
The book you're reading is a little harder to
get through for the casual reader than the vital Western World textbook
mentioned above because it's not meant to be read quickly like biographical
anecdotes or face-value sociological observations. This is meant to be a
treasury of acute musical and lyrical research that the reader can have a lot of
fun with and gain some insight from. Pore through it with the scrutiny of an (at
least kinda) intrigued treasure-hunter and I promise you'll find it most
satisfying. Sure, reading casually or quickly will often entertain you like a
regular book; but a lot of parts will seem tedious to the not-so-intrigued Zappa
listener if approached with one eye.
A handful of books have been written to open
more mind-levels during the stimulating enjoyment of Frank's music. At least 90%
of what appears in this book is based on my own observations and deductions. The
rest is here as a result of (hopefully) successful attempts at whittling down
the stuff in those other books, making the content consequential to the music
itself and removing it from often bafflingly irrelevant contexts. This research,
quote-grabbing and fact-validating was obviously done because no rational idea
from another author can be left out when one assembles a complete text about the
Zappa canon. So I've picked and chosen those bits based in reality from the
following books, freeing good points from within their silly settings and
leaving out unsupported conclusion-jumps. Frank Zappa: A Visual
Documentary by Miles. 1993, Omnibus
Press. Easily the best Zappa
chronology currently available, this photo-laden calendar contains the least
amount of unnecessary poop out of all of these books, since it's a documentary
and therefore kept devoid of sheer author opinion. Its accurate discography and
rare FZ interview excerpts make it a fantastic source of facts for the
enthusiastic listener. The editing and photo-caption typesetting are often,
unfortunately, horrific.
Frank Zappa In His Own Words by
Miles. 1993, Omnibus
Press. Many of these enlightening
interviews on several topics were referred-to to qualify some of my own
observations, albeit more for Frank's sociological perspectives relevant to his
lyrics than purely musical aspects. Again, I didn't have to skirt around
frivolous stuff to find the information I needed, since the book's just a
collection of quotes. I just wish there were more about music and less about,
say, politics. Chris Charlesworth's editing isn't quite as bad as in the book
above.
Zappa! Special Issue from the publishers of
Keyboard and Guitar Player magazines. 1992.
Edited by Don Menn. This tribute
contains interviews and date information, referred-to in my text less often than
Miles's documentaries but imperative nonetheless to certain compositional and
lyrical perspectives. The FZ interview is thankfully the longest section and
it's absolutely wonderful.
Mother! Is the Story of Frank Zappa by
Michael Gray. Plexus,
1985. This is the perfect example
of the uninformed music story. Gray puts in more of his own opinions -- seeming
indifferent (and sometimes deaf) to the music -- and more about Zappa's
hypothesized love-life than musical observations or insights. Gray writes like a
magazine critic with a chip on his shoulder. Maybe he was brushed off or ignored
by Frank at some point. There appear many utterly unsubstantiated or simply
fabricated conclusions about Zappa's self-image and motivations, and Gray's view
of listeners is snobbish and distorted. Other than a very small amount of solid
facts concerning the places and times at which certain things happened or were
recorded, there's a lot of simply wrong stuff if one uses every other book (and
every Zappa interview) as a collective basis for comparison. Other than
occasional date verification, the only thing I gleaned from the book was an
environmental vantage-point thanks to Gray's uncharacteristically solid grip on
post-war attitudes and decor, which he offers as his introduction. I found some
of this useful when examining album covers. Zappa's book and interviews were
drawn-from when his upbringing was relevant to something I'd written; I don't
think I learned anything concrete in that area from Gray's intro. It was more of
an aesthetic thing concerning some of the artwork he had Cal Schenkel
fashion.
Frank Zappa: The Negative Dialectics of Poodle Play by
Ben Watson. 1993, St. Martin's
Press. Oh, boy. Here's the big one.
I imagine that this book's the one to which my own's most likely to be compared,
since they're both long and they both penetrate more deeply into Zappa's music
than your average volume dealing with all of an artist's output. Mr. Watson is
an incredibly sharp master of research, subtext and cross-reference. His
experiences following Zappa's tours and events and his collection of
Zappa-related periodicals make his book immediately valid as reference material
for any subsequent author and certainly put him light-years ahead of someone
like Michael Gray as far as genuineness goes. The downside: Much of Poodle
Play is centered around ridiculous leaps of logic connecting Zappa's music
to the works of dramatic, literary, political and sociological figures
(Shakespeare, Adorno and many others) whose words the composer most likely never
even glanced at, given his stated disinterest in books. Watson does explain this
in his own roundabout manner; he also establishes that the extraneous
connections permeating his exhaustive effort work only within the context of
Poodle Play (the term given to his exercises in comparing Zappa's music to old
literature). I agree wholeheartedly; the scholarliness Watson applies is truly
Out To Lunch (his self-appointed nickname) and his premise detracts from the
interesting bits of the
book. Regardless, Poodle
Play was fundamental to certain connections I wouldn't have otherwise
noticed. Watson's realizations make up at least half of the
third-party-referencing 10% of my own volume. He presents the results of uncanny
scouring of album covers, valuable facts and dates concerning Zappa history and
some really neat interview excerpts. But for all of his attentiveness to Frank's
avoidance of labels and genre compartments, Watson loves labels himself. He
attempts in his Marxist manner to pigeonhole everyone he talks about (including
FZ), smacking political terms onto their works and outlooks that fall off like
cheap sticky-notes. It's a good thing the actually relevant, fun parts are
numerous, tweezed as they must be from within the rubbish.
The Frank
Zappa Companion by Richard Kostelanetz. 1997, Schirmer
Books. This is a cute little
collection of essays that's kinda confusing because of its name as held against
its length: It's really short, especially when one considers the huge amount of
stuff that's been said by and written about Frank. There are some provacative
commentaries and great interviews, but I found myself wishing for a lot more
from Frank and less from Ben Watson (he may as well have been listed as
co-author). So much is left out. What about the 200 Motels press kit,
Frank's Them Or Us book or highlights from the numerous fanzines? This
so-called companion is a half-ass effort, but at least the stuff it does contain
is usually fun to read. Strangely,
the compiler is one of those people who thinks that the only good Zappa music
was the early stuff. And the discography's inaccurate; a few dates are wrong.
It's less a companion than a collection of curios, but I used a few quotes from
it.
No Commercial Potential by David
Walley. 1972, Outerbridge &
Lazard. I've never read this one.
In a series of communiques between Walley and Ben Watson that was made available
on the Internet, Watson scolds the author for coming to the conclusion in his
book that Frank used people and was basically a selfish and inconsiderate
bastard. I have no interest in entertaining the ideas of authors who go to great
lengths to write books and then reveal that they don't respect their subjects. I
mean, why bother writing, then? Y'know? Walley apparently missed the simple fact
that Frank hired musicians, kept himself on as strictly professional a basis
with them as possible and made it clear to them exactly what he was hiring them
for.
As far as the book you're currently reading
goes, remember to have fun. What's the point otherwise?
Final Introduction (I promise):
What Does "Awake" Really Mean, Anyway?
So many potential channels of identification
work with Frank's music that it becomes an ironically universal ocean in spite
of its decidedly inaccessible ignorance of boundaries.
So here's something I really wanted to point
out as an additional possibility for most any Zappa song, but particularly those
that aren't meant to be pop parodies or straightforward rock tunes. It's a thing
to apply generally, because I think it's on solid ground and really makes some
of this music that much more captivating in a certain corner of the listening
brain; in fact, it's offered for such enveloping application that I'll hardly
mention it again. I'll open the explanation with a quote from good ol' Out To
Lunch.
In dreams, actions and objects of the most
complete triviality...can become endowed with great affective
power. (Watson)
Zappa's lyrics, with their frequent
overemphases on little things and seemingly insignificant images of everyday
life (listen to "Billy the Mountain" on 1972's Just Another Band From
L.A. for a good example), not to mention the recurrences of those kinds of
incidental objects and outwardly nonsensical phrases throughout Zappa's
catalogue (sometimes decades after an initial appearance), seem to point to the
idea that this music takes place in a dream (or many dreams). The notes and
rhythms themselves often possess the peculiar nature of dreams; the frequently
non-traditional note groupings, intervals and dissonant chords resemble the
awkward reality of subconscious imagery. The music could be coming from the
performer/character's subconscious mind, a part of the brain that doesn't adhere
to traditional structures of life.
Dreams reflect those parts of reality that a
person's too uncomfortable with or trained against to think about during his
waking hours; they act as a housecleaning-type defense against the insanity
potentially caused by the accumulation of disturbing mental baggage. Zappa's
words deal with those bits of life that are too touchy to be confronted on a
level of mass consciousness or too raw-nerved for authorities to address
appropriately or change. Dreams are, after all, where we encounter our real
fears; a lot of the bad-guy characters in Frank's songs do ridiculous things
because they're afraid of confronting their insecurities head-on.
Although it should be stressed that it is,
again, a generalization, not to be applied to every piece of music without
hesitation, it would stimulate the listener to be aware of the animated
thought-fluidity of a lot of Zappa's pieces and the lyrical images that seem
exaggerative of real life. Just like in dreams.
Going further, the composer frequently attacked
those who would keep people (and their kids) ignorant of "taboo" things instead
of educating them and rendering them prepared to decide for themselves in
prevention of creative discouragement or being taken advantage of in one way or
another. This was a basis of his testimonials to censorship advocators. Dreams
dig up the dirt like Zappa always did, encouraging everything to be out in the
open with nothing kept secret or mystical to become either damaging to the
individual spirit or exploited for cash. Watson mentions Frank's "relentless
emphasis on the structures that channel desire," explaining, among other things,
the lyrics' occasional preoccupations with strange sexual outlets and explaining
in a different way the musical comments on the commodity of record albums (see
the chapters about Freak Out!, Lumpy Gravy and We're Only In It For
the Money elsewhere in this book). Sexual hangups are frequently dealt with
in dreams.
The music takes from a palette of "everything
that's ever been" ("The Torture Never Stops" on 1976's Zoot Allures).
Zappa had definite views on the God invented by mankind, as one can hear in
"Dumb All Over" from 1981's You Are What You Is and as one can read in
The Real Frank Zappa Book; in the latter he purports that God is
basically saying, "Get smart and I'll fuck you over." This is not a being of
complete truth; this, like the government that loves the idea of a
God-fearing public, is a being of psychological extortion, and Frank's musical
dream-images throw into life all that's blacked-out in this sort of
brainwashing. Everything that's ever been is used as a starting ground for
potential compositional inclusion, an infinite universe with all its at-first
trivial images that can serve as subconscious triggers of the hidden,
uncomfortable parts of life that are solved only by being confronted. Nothing
that's ever been should be covered up.
Frank wrote a circular in 1971 for the 200
Motels press kit that read, in part, "We make a special art in an
environment hostile to dreamers." This music's being thrust into an environment
that frowns on the unmasking of reality's disturbing bits, a climate hostile
to people who like the absolute truth, the music being made for these dissatisfieds.
This indicates that the world's a malevolence of holes that the compositions
seek to fill with lyrical and musical dream-stuff -- unrestrained sound and
overblown images -- therefore creating a sub-world in order to closely examine
and even parody the real one. Zappa's magnifying glass contorts images as it's
moved over different parts of a map of the world, and it wouldn't take a listener
much effort to discern that these abnormalities are rooted in the subconscious,
the part of the mind reserved for things we don't want to admit. As one reference
to this whole idea, one of Frank's oft-played 1980s pieces was called "While
You Were Out."
The same press kit elsewhere reads, "Somebody
out there in that audience knows what we are doing, and that person is getting
off on it beyond his/her wildest
comprehensions."
Thank you for being
interested enough to read my stuff. This is a work in progress; new chapters
will be added periodically as I complete them. As you'll see, there's already a
ton of material here. Read on, and remember: MUSIC IS THE
BEST! Chris
Federico
The Ultimate Rule ought to be: "If it
sounds GOOD to YOU, it's bitchen; and if it sounds BAD to YOU, it's
shitty."
(The Real Frank Zappa Book)
Freak Out!
From the beginning of his recording career,
Frank Zappa was keenly aware of the promotion-controlled pop trends he wished to
obliterate. His first project was to exploit them in order to interject
advocations of free thinking -- to appear as another "popular but weird" artist
in order to infiltrate the industry's machinery and change it from the inside.
One of his initial hopes for his first band, the Mothers of Invention, was that
they'd clear the way for the more inventive, less compartmentalized music he
believed possible from America's surviving independent minds. This was an
optimism that would diminish in time.
The Mothers' debut album, Freak Out!,
was the first step in slyly damaging the mythical barrier between "high" and
"low" art; simple pop-rock tunes share equal space with long, symphonic
percussive experiments. With this first-ever rock double set, Frank sought to
point out the ridiculous limits of the listeners' musical world. In doing so, he
came close to insulting them outright; but apart from a select group of fans who
"got it," he mostly just confused them. The more accessible songs on the album
sounded outdated as far as the 1966 climate went. It was a way of emphasizing
and overdoing the mindlessness seen from the vantage point on radio music he
sought to provide. It was also a way of asserting, in the contrast between the
album's first and second halves, just how unique were free-feeling compositions
compared to teen-tailored pop humdrum. While the album fell short of mainstream
success, sides 3 and 4 hit a nerve with the burgeoning underground, the album
therefore remaining a discernible influence on everything that followed that
departed from conventional pop forms. The most commercial example is the
Beatles' 1967 album Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, which Paul
McCartney has said was partly inspired by Freak Out!, the first
conceptual rock album.
To eager listeners it became a classic in its
own time because there hadn't been anything like it before; it excited a lot of
people because of its "weirdness" and its existence as a completely separate
entity from the radio. It found more listeners than other non-customary works
like John Cage's explicitly orchestral material because it presented itself as
part of the rock genre. It also must have been fantastic and nearly therapeutic
for many younger listeners to hear Frank utterly bash jocks who thought their
meeting places were truly "where the action is" ("You're Probably Wondering Why
I'm Here") and use the vehicle of predictable pop music to reflect such mundane
mindsets. It was probably even more thrilling to hear him use his own
uncompromising hard rock to voice unfashionable slams like "Take your TV tube
and eat it" ("Trouble Every Day").
[Freak Out!] was really simultaneously
crude and ugly, and incredibly sophisticated. The Beatles were funny, but there
was nothing with the kind of sneer that you could feel in the music of Frank
Zappa.
(Simpsons creator Matt Groening; from the 12/17/93 Late-Show
Special on BBC2)
It inspired the avant-garde community, but its
point was that there didn't really need to be an avant-garde; things
could be mixed up according to the way the artist wanted to present his stuff.
But on its most superficial level it was foremost a spoof on America's cheesy
popular music, a collection of songs disguised as ditties but meant to highlight
stupidity for those who listened closely and with somewhat aloof ears. In this
way Frank began his attempts at playing the part in order to change popular
music from within (the same infiltration tactic that rendered the suit-and-tie
appearance he adopted during his anti-censorship campaigns in the '80s).
I am trying to use the weapons of a
disoriented and unhappy society against itself. The Mothers of Invention are
designed to come in the back door and kill you while you're sleeping. One of our
main, short-range objectives is to do away with the Top-40 broadcasting format
because it is basically wrong, unethical and
unmusical. (FZ
quoted by Robert Shelton in the New York Times, 12/25/67)
The "freaks" on the streets of late-'60s Los
Angeles were both Zappa's example for illustrating certain listeners' discontent
with office-fabricated trends and fad-oriented social groups, and his intended
initial fans who sought to express themselves freely. As can be read in the
album's liner notes, the term "freaks" was essentially sarcastic ("less
perceptive individuals" used the word). Also, drastic deviations from standard
societal appearance and values never ceased to fascinate him. There was
potential there: Individual freaks of nature (exceptions to conditioning) were
still possible thanks to the relentless human spirit. Throughout his career he'd
mention other exceptions to cultural (and even natural) norms, ever ready to
point out the possibility of deviation in a world seeking to remain constant and
rule-abiding. Munchkins, Bobby (a guy with a potato-head), an Illinois criminal
who forces enemas on girls and a mutated human called Thing-Fish all appear with
the strikingly non-standardized aesthetics of the music itself. Even within
instrumental pieces, Zappa succeeds in creating an atmosphere in which the
abnormal is welcomed; you expect something "strange" to happen anyway, a unique
angle that succeeds in turning the music as a total entity into, in part, a
countercultural preassumption -- an aspect that gave Zappa and his musicians
incredible freedom in regards to their fans' expectations.
Frank's spotlighting of freaks worked on a
mocking, "look how ugly we are!" level as well; the supposedly envied echelons
of society saw those straying from life's normal procedures as ugly deformities.
This was extended to the way the government detested minorities, gays and
(hypocritically enough, in light of much of the daily news) freely sexual people
on the Thing-Fish album in 1984. Frank included himself among those seen
as freaks by the ruling class and white middle class; onstage in the mid-'70s he
called himself Rondo Hatton, the name of an actor known as the "ugliest man in
pictures" after poisonous gas deformed him during World War II. This ties into
the parallel in 1976's Zoot Allures between America and Nazi Germany
("Pumpin' the gas every night"), casting Frank as one of those who the Nazis in
"Plastic People" (Absolutely Free, 1967) want to stop. It also ties into
the Thing-Fish character, deformed by the government's alleged biochemical
warfare against gays and minorities as part of the right-wing plan to illustrate
divine retribution (a'la Frank's theory about how Republicans started AIDS). The
resulting "fear of God" helps conservatives get elected, as heard in "Heavenly
Bank Account" on 1981's You Are What You Is (similar gospel-style music
is heard on Thing-Fish). These connections are cemented by the fact that
Zoot Allures and Thing-Fish are tied together overtly; "The
Torture Never Stops" appears on both albums (it's called "The Torchum Never
Stops" on the latter, consistent with the Thing-Fish's sarcastically exaggerated
black language).
So, looking at freaks in this context, we can
see why Frank often encouraged audiences to sardonically indulge in their own
images as seen through America's eyes. Even the stereotyped version of an
independent person is better than someone led by (or becoming) one of those
doing the stereotyping. It's the same reason blacks call each other "nigga":
They make fun of the white man's term in order to deflate the impact of his
prejudice, sending his feelings of superiority to the corner with a dunce cap.
During a live version of "Packard Goose" (from 1979's Joe's Garage) in
the late '70s or early '80s, as can be heard on the bootleg album Show &
Tell, he tells the audience, "I'd like each and every one of you to
fantasize along with me this evening that, in some small way, the process of
performing this show will rid you of your own personal demon, whatever it is
that's bothering the shit out of you this year [see this book's introduction
about dreams]... Today it's time for the people who have been the victims
of [the government's] disregard to turn around and disregard something else."
Freak Out!, like the next few Zappa
albums, takes the freak characters of the '60s, those who all looked and
listened differently from each other and refused to appear fashionable or even
tasteful, and uses them as a protest entity against the methodized,
commodity-tuned lifestyles of the modern Western World. What makes this album a
bit scary is that it applies today in that context as much as it did in 1966.
The hippies weren't part of this freak
community. Fad-conformist and unoriginal, those lazy minds always come off as
being no different than the average dumb American material kids in Zappa songs
that mention them (they're the primary targets of the '68 album We're Only In
It For the Money). San Francisco's general music community was viewed as an
ethnocentric group of fashionables with no ears for original-sounding music.
Record one of Freak Out! is mostly
cheesy pop, occasionally sounding a little less spoofy when cranked out as
rhythm and blues. A lot of it is in fact pretty damn enjoyable. Frank was a
doo-wop and R&B fan as a kid and had hundreds of singles before he even
happened upon his first orchestral album (an Edgar Varese collection, which
would partly shape his perspectives on composition and timbral contrasts). But
the two-seconds-away-from-cracking-up tone of Ray Collins's singing and the
over-echoing ambiance of the production hint that the structure here is
deliberately even flimsier than when it's holding up typical pop music. The
props and flats are purposefully near-transparent to clue the listener into
something sinister going on behind the stage lights of commodity music (among
other things).
The illusion of freedom will continue as long
as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion
becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they
will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way
and you will see the brick wall at the back of the
theater. (FZ
quoted by Jim Ladd, Nuggets #7, 5/77)
That makes Freak Out! a little spookier.
Rather than just being, in its first half, a collection of obviously contrived
tunes, it attempts to make said scenery a little more detectable than usual. The
200 Motels movie will carry this to a visual extreme in 1971.
At the same time, Frank manages to illustrate
an awareness and scrutiny of the less-than-obvious bits of American bigotry;
before starting in with the "unaccessible" music, record two opens with a
rock'n'roll protest against both black and white discrimination ("Trouble Every
Day") that seems too earnest to fit comfortably with the first two sides of the
album. The Watts Riots provide the theme, but the mindsets going on behind them
are subject to their own blunt lyricism. Frank's own scenery, at least, is
coming down at this point. The contrast between this heartfelt, bluesy anger and
the preceding tongue-in-cheek numbers only serves to make the exasperation more
sincere and affecting. The rock music to which the Mothers actually commit their
skills sounds all the more moving when slotted next spoofs on the kinds of music
Americans can be talked into listening to (Elvis and other white performers
sounded ridiculous to Frank when copying black music; the Mothers were white, so
even rhythm and blues should be heard with a modicum of sarcasm, taking into
account Frank's comments on the contrived entertainment industry). Since a lot
of Zappa's lyrics make fun of cheap Western things to telescope the inhumanity
and unmusicalness of a profit-driven society, racial prejudice and reactionary
violence are natural targets; the class system's presented in the music as just
another commodity laid on gullible consumers, xenophobia being part of this.
Zappa noticed the McCarthy effects prevalent during his childhood:
[Our family] had two problems. One was the
Security Clearance; the other was the fact that my father was born in Sicily and
my mother was first-generation, from Italian and French parents. And in most of
the places we lived, anybody who was not one hundred percent all-white American
was a threat to the community, y'know? And being associated with somebody of a
foreign parentage made it tough for me in school and made it tough on them.
There was that whole aspect of American life and I never did understand it.
(FZ, quoted in
Gray)
Understanding the nuances of advertising,
partly because he'd worked for a short time for a greeting card company to make
ends meet during his first marriage, Frank made sure that the cover of Freak
Out! was, above all, eye-catching. Its '60s bubbles and curves, along with
the indulgent tinting and back-cover quote from a mythical fan named Suzy
Creamcheese complaining that the album was too weird and that she didn't know
what some of the lyrics meant, reeled-in the record buyer with the deliberate
message that this stuff was both right up his alley and a little mysterious.
Strange was in, but it was still rare to see something presented as stranger
than the normal, record-businessman-concocted strangeness (not to mention
comically self-deprecating). This was brilliantly intensified by the liner
notes' claim that Frank himself rarely appeared with the band onstage, which
wasn't true but which served to place the composer above the popular scene.
The gatefold montage of pictures and quotes
might've been seen as part of the "let's make fun of pop" motif, but Frank
declared himself unhappy with it, so it was mostly a product of MGM design; it
wasn't his intention that most of the people couldn't be made out in the badly
reproduced photos. But the liner notes were Frank's entirely, endearing the
Mothers to their potential listeners with self-aimed humor and challenges to the
average pop consumer.
After "Trouble Every Day" the album becomes an
inventive orgasm of vocal playfulness and percussive immensity. Although
retaining the album's sarcastic regard of pop in its straightforward series of
backbeats -- and remaining at the primitive end of its creative life due to the
time-limits imposed on Frank and his bare production staff during the recording
of the first two Mothers albums -- its production displays an acute heedfulness
of how to keep things spacious and fresh-sounding, indicating that producer Tom
Wilson and staff had some help from Frank at least in the mixing stage. The lack
of pop scenery and the freedom with which these vocal and percussive
explorations of the timbral spectrum were captured and presented put it worlds
away from something like the possibly intentional variance on the Stones'
"Satisfaction" that opened the album, a simultaneously goofy- and angry-sounding
song about hopeful mass dissatisfaction called "Hungry Freaks, Daddy."
In his Real Frank Zappa Book, Frank says
that every song on Freak Out! "had a function within an overall satirical
concept." The first piece launches his recording career with a growling
fuzz-guitar riff that's catchy if foreboding, its suspiciously sparse sonics
notwithstanding. It breathes, at least, finding a freshness in the reverb
effects. Frank's Gibson ES-5 Switchmaster guitar grooves and sounds mad at
something.
After two instrumental measures a higher guitar
harmonizes with the first, which itself drops into a lower register with added
grimace. Frank and Ray sing the words in an almost tuneless jeer that attempts
to elicit the listener's anger at the ideas therein, and they sarcastically
taunt society to do what it's already doing. It's a communication of disgust:
"Mr. America, walk on by your schools that do not teach."
The sleeve notes about the song are provocative
as well:
Drop out of school before your mind rots from
exposure to our mediocre educational system. Forget about the Senior Prom and go
to the library and EDUCATE YOURSELF if you've got any guts. Some of you like PEP
RALLIES and plastic robots who tell you what to read. Forget I mentioned it.
THIS SONG HAS NO MESSAGE. Rise for the flag salute.
The only actual element of cheesy commodity
music is a vibe part, sounding like fake-friendly doorbells as it backs the
guitars. Come on in; just don't take everything completely seriously. A kazoo
sound concludes the two bridges, aligning popular idioms with little-kid music
in a cheap-fanfare manner. Zappa molds the garbage of the industrial music
machine into aural pictures of pure acidity.
The lyrics attempt no subtext or actual
metaphors for their complaints; America's lies are bluntly addressed, the freaks
heralded as the "minds that won't be reached" and lamented as the "left-behinds
of the Great Society." Zappa jumped at chances for pointing out exceptions to
the nation's politically beneficial "work ethic," any potential he detected in
individuals who ridiculed the standards that citizens were normally expected to
follow and the "American dreams" they were supposed to believe in.
The importance placed on a person's financial
standing, vocational position or material accumulation is cited as America
trying to "hide the emptiness that's you inside"; superficial things are
evidently endorsed as being important in order to cover up the wan, frustrated
existences of people afraid to try and find the actual special things about
themselves and who endeavor to convince themselves and others that their career
images are worth a shit. This is a frequent topic throughout Zappa's musical
library.
The song's ultimately optimistic; nothing will
"forestall the rising tide of hungry freaks, daddy." But the bridge switches the
scene for a moment to cheap urban America, devoid of the main riff's insistence
and incorporating sing-songy vocals that depart from the monotone of the verses.
The Muzakal icon of the vibes is highlighted and the singers mention the "Great
Midwestern hardware store," the first broadly inclusive element of plastic
American idealism in a Zappa song. The ultimate listeners are encouraged and
toted as "those who aren't afraid to say what's on their minds" and the bridge
concludes with the comical kazoo fanfare. Using such musical cliches makes the
song an effective protest against herd-mentality because it carries a palpable
sense of revelation: The parody's so laughable that it's quite alarming to
realize how pervasive these corns are in pop music, how familiar and almost
unnoticeable they can be.
Frank's guitar solo's tempestuous, stopping
halfway after a barrage of conclusive blues notes -- which tell the listener
that he's now hearing the hungry freaks -- before setting off on a more melodic,
almost wistful-sounding solo that comes closer to preparing the ear for the
impending return to the main riff, which now sounds intentionally half-witted,
as if the music's suddenly remembered that it's supposed to be appealing to a
record label's idea of accessibility. The solo has quaked the Fender Deluxe amp,
desperate to break from the formula pop and just rock for a moment.
The last verse has Frank singing alone to
highlight the words and add weight to the protests. America's now walking
approvingly and apathetically by its "supermarket dream," a phrase that embodies
the shallow nature of the cultural icons Frank pans. Now the "liquor store
supreme" is introduced, a foreshadowing of things like the pair of "America
Drinks" songs on the next album.
Already we have a prototypical '60s power-riff,
huge shops of cheap American junk, empty Western illusions that hide
insecurities, uneducated kids and a reference to liquor -- all aspects that tie
into future Zappa music to a great extent. This would be a good time to
interject the only near-clear statement Frank ever made about his famous
"conceptual continuity."
Perhaps the most unique aspect of the Mothers'
work is the CONCEPTUAL CONTINUITY of the group's OUTPUT MACROSTRUCTURE. There is
and always has been a conscious control of thematic and structural elements
flowing through each album... Imagine the decades and the pile of stuff on
them subjected to EXTENSIVE LONG-RANGE CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE MODIFICATION.
Houses, offices. People live there and work there. Imagine that YOU could be
living there and working there and not even know it. Whether you can imagine it
or not, that's what the deal
is. (1971 FZ
interview in International Times #115)
That's apparently what the deal is with the
governmentally and corporately controlled culture we live in -- men in suits
constructing the world as their own little microcosm, which succeeds in existing
because of how people have allowed themselves to become gullible and mentally
lazy. So that's how Zappa clarifies and parodies that culture: with his own
microcosm. The themes running through his work are based on us, real
people represented in the music as extremes and caricatures that often
incorporate elements of nature to remind us of how mortal we are, how separate
from these supermarket dreams our actual living energy is and how irrelevant
material symbols really are. Parts of real life, trivial bits of everyday
existence in a commodity society, are blown up within these reconstructed
landscapes to represent magnified fears and insecurities normally restricted to
the subconscious mind. Revelation is the key to purging. Zappa lyrics magnify
trivialities, since people hide from a lot of parts of reality -- including what
they know to be right -- in order to remain safe and yet feel important. But "if
you've got any guts..."
The last verse ends with the divulgence that
Mr. America has avoided exceptions to his system by shrugging and stepping
aside, wrapped up as he is in his own "savage pride" and refusing to meet the
challenge of any independent thought that might threaten his tidy system. After
one more bridge, sounding as if it's repeated more for the irony of formula than
to build on the climactic effect of the last verse (it weakens it instead), the
song closes with the unresolved kazoo note that's been ending each bridge,
sounding like a question and leaving the obnoxious odors of the song's
cheaper-sounding instruments in the air for contemplation. If the ending note
were played on an electric guitar, the song's banality wouldn't sound so
mistrusted by the performers. It really does sound like a challenge to the
listener: Have you got any guts, really? Are you ready for original-sounding
music? It's a fitting front door to the Zappa microcosm in the midst of the
empty pop world. A final flurry of low guitar notes reminds us that he's here
amidst these things, that he'll explore the landscape for us.
"Who Are the Brain Police?" asks listeners if
their lives would cease to bring them pleasure or meaning if the products set up
for them were to suddenly disappear. It uses the record album as a model, asking
what we'd do if the label were to come off and the plastic were to melt. Even
the chrome of the ('60s) stereo doesn't escape the hypothetical challenge, and
it's a terrific cross-reference to the teenager's all-important car in a couple
of the album's R&B tunes. Would the music remain intact in our minds,
bodiless as it actually is? Would it mean as much if it were pure sound,
stripped of its materialistic edge? In pointing out exactly how this
anti-establishment music is ironically getting to listeners via the commodity
process, Frank and Ray challenge us to figure out who's policing our minds -- to
recognize where other records, top-tens, come from exactly.
"Go Cry On Somebody Else's Shoulder" contains a
parody of Pachuco dialect, but the song itself, whether its '50s sound is a
semi-joke or not, is actually quite beautiful, with Ray really nailing
immemorial doo-wop ad-libs. There are hilarious lines regarding the limited
perspectives of teenagers (and even hinting at a desire for the return of young
naivete), like "I'm somewhat wiser now/and one whole year older." Most of the
simplex songs are a lot of fun if the listener allows himself to indulge in the
undiluted joy of sweet-tasting poppy rock. To not give something a chance just
because its formula's common indicates the same sort of shallowness as only
listening to radio music. Zappa's main point: If something gives you pleasure to
listen to, it requires no extraneous validation.
Whereas "I'm Not Satisfied" is already upstaged
by its lovely blues rendition on 1968's Cruising With Ruben & the
Jets (assuming one's heard that album), "I Ain't Got No Heart" succeeds in
making Frank sound sincere about his steadfast words by contrast to the atypical
"revisiting the oldies" feel of the rushed '81 version on Tinseltown
Rebellion.
"The Return of the Son of Monster Magnet," its
title personifying the magnetic recording head on a tape machine, contains a
segment called "Ritual Dance of the Child-Killer," referring to Frank's advances
in the second half of the album on young, naive Suzy Creamcheese and the sexy
sounds, violently backed Varese-style, that suggest that he's been successful. A
girl from narrow-minded America, a reluctant fan who's written a letter of
complaint to the Mothers, has been converted into a groupie. This plot and the
words in "Motherly Love" suggest sexually what Zappa said in interviews about
sneaking into the public (see above); the reference to back doors makes for an
interesting extra meaning! Suzy's late-'60s-style induction into the freaks
exemplifies how capable hands with recording technology at their disposal can do
whatever they want with supposedly private moments; they can also turn the world
into whatever they want in the interest of forging intellectual weaponry against
corporate corruption and psychological repression. This won't be the last time
Frank illustrates this for us.
Lumpy Gravy
After the Mothers' first two albums, Zappa
proudly presented something to his fans that was an even less orthodox 1967
shelf product than his pop lampooning, blues mutations and operatic exploits had
been. After contacting symphonic session musicians through trombonist Kenneth
Shroyer, who'd played on Absolutely Free, Frank formed the one-off
Abnuceals Emuukha Electric Symphony Orchestra & Chorus, a title given to the
musicians and characters as they appeared on the album rather than in any actual
live performance; the "Chorus" (speaking cast) was certainly edited together
from separate sessions and woven into the musical frames in great premeditated
detail.
In part, making a bunch of contributors appear
as a single entity despite their independent performances being assembled to
form an ongoing piece was a comment on manufactured bands. These were definitely
around -- Gary Lewis and the Playboys, the Monkees, assorted bubblegum groups --
and all were, on their records at least, products of their respective producers.
In that sense, Frank himself was really the AEESO & Chorus. An earnest work
of creative breakthroughs was therefore sardonically presented in the manner of
those pop groups. Implied was that the material itself mattered in this
particular composer's case, regardless of how it got onto the master tape (an
idea that also inadvertently defended the Monkees and company).
The album featured only four Mothers: Bunk
Gardner, on woodwinds and brass, was the only musical performer, while the other
three -- Jimmy Carl Black, Roy Estrada and Jim "Motorhead" Sherwood -- were
listed as part of the Chorus: groups of people recorded conversing inside an
actual piano during several sessions. The dialogue was edited into compositions
via Frank's razor blade, the music as a total comprising these newly angled
conversations as well as the songs played by the orchestra and the sound movies
made up of percussion and timbral experiments. There aren't any lyrical tunes;
the intended vocal facet of the music is the sculpted piano dialogue.
The grand piano was situated in Apostolic Studios
in New York City. According to Frank, he amassed eight or nine hours of recorded
dialogue from which to select. The album, one long composition divided into
two parts (record sides), is a result of turning gobs of raw material into a
striking, provocative program with predetermined atmospherics and succession.
In that sense, the Synclavier pieces of twenty-odd years later weren't much
different in essential form. Lumpy Gravy conjures visions, on a
purely technical level, of Zappa sitting bent over reels of tape, slicing exacted
lengths of sound from this one or that and restructuring them into the presentation
he wants us to hear.
The people in the piano will resurface on the
next Mothers album, We're Only In It For the Money, in a few spots on
albums in coming years and finally on 1994's posthumous Civilization Phaze
III, in which they form the nucleus of the plot, itself a continuation of
the accounts in Lumpy Gravy.
This was the earliest commercial appearance of
Zappa's symphonic work and the first of his releases to contain the
unsurpassedly explored compositional potential of sounds not normally associated
with music, such as taped percussive noises achieved by hitting things other
than drums, the speed often altered to get an altogether unique effect. One of
the reasons the depth of Frank's symphonic vision wasn't apparent prior to
Lumpy Gravy was that he wasn't allowed to take his time with the first
two Mothers albums; MGM had held him to a very tight recording schedule back in
California, which was one of the reasons he'd start his own record label before
the decade was out.
Lumpy Gravy's creation took about nine
months (We're Only In It For the Money, Cruising With Ruben & the
Jets and Uncle Meat were in the works at Apostolic at the same time).
The dialogue not used in the extensive piece
sat in my tape vault for decades, waiting for the glorious day when audio
science would develop tools which might allow for its resurrection...since the
ambience would vanish disturbingly at the edit point. ...As a result, what
emerged from the texts [to appear on Lumpy Gravy] was a vague plot
regarding pigs and ponies threatening the lives of characters who inhabit[ed] a
large piano. (FZ,
from the liner notes of Civilization Phaze III)
The spontaneous dialogue and the music
fashioned out of elements other than (but not necessarily omitting) instrument
sounds reflect Zappa's fascination with documenting "real life" and making it
part of the frozen time available as the commercial music world. Particular
attention's paid to the psycho-sociological reasons behind common behavior, with
the strong implication (especially on this album) that among the stimuli are the
narrow, enclosed perspectives into which people are trained; the piano's a
tangible image of this entrapment. It doesn't necessarily make the average
American into an unwitting victim, but rather a self-victim who has but to use
his brain to escape confinement (cf. the "educate yourself" liner notes quoted
in the Freak Out! section of this book, not to mention the tons of
relevant lyrical insinuation and provocation throughout Frank's music). The
composer's documentation of society as it exists outside the plotted confines of
typical lyricism, or "amateur anthropology" as he called it, would become a
standard component of the rest of his library. Further, musical phrases,
especially guitar solos, would become based on speech patterns, drawing from the
fluid, animated way in which people communicate and reflecting human spirit,
whether beautiful, displaced or gnawing.
To gain another perspective on Zappa's approach
to the series of sound shocks that is the Lumpy Gravy album, let's be on
familiar terms with his general definition of composition:
A person with a feel for rhythm can walk into
a factory and hear the machine noise as a composition. If we expand that concept
to include light, behavior, weather factors, moon phases, anything (whether it's
a rhythm that can be HEARD or a rhythm that is PERCEIVED, i.e., a color change
OVER TIME -- or a SEASON), it can be CONSUMED as music. If it can be CONCEIVED
AS MUSIC, it can be EXECUTED AS MUSIC and PRESENTED TO AN AUDIENCE IN SUCH A WAY
THAT THEY WILL PERCEIVE IT AS MUSIC. ...Music,
in performance, is a type of sculpture. The air in the performance space is
SCULPTED INTO SOMETHING. This "molecule-sculpture-over-time" is then "looked at"
by the ears of the listeners -- or a microphone. ...A composer is a guy who
goes around forcing his will on unsuspecting air molecules, often with the aid
of unsuspecting musicians.
Want to be a composer? You don't even have to
be able to WRITE IT DOWN. The stuff that gets written down is only a recipe...
If you can THINK DESIGN, you can EXECUTE DESIGN -- it's only a bunch of air
molecules. Who's gonna check up on you? JUST
FOLLOW THESE SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Declare
your INTENTION to create a "composition." 2.
START a piece at SOME TIME. 3. Cause SOMETHING
TO HAPPEN OVER A PERIOD OF TIME (it doesn't matter what happens in your
"time hole" -- we have
critics to tell us whether it's any good or not, so we won't worry about that
part). 4.
END THE PIECE AT SOME TIME (or keep it going, telling the audience it is a "work
in progress"). 5. Get a part-time job so you
can continue to do stuff like this.
In my
compositions, I employ a system of weights, balances, measured tensions and
releases. ...If you can conceive of ANY MATERIAL as a "weight" and any
IDEA-OVER-TIME as a "balance," you are ready for the next step: the
"entertainment objects" that derive from those
concepts. If a musical point can be made in a
more entertaining way by SAYING a word than by SINGING a word, the SPOKEN WORD
will win out in the arrangement -- unless a NON-WORD or a MOUTH NOISE gets the
point across
faster. (The
Real Frank Zappa Book)
The "balance" of Lumpy Gravy -- people
hiding from pigs and ponies, restricted to the enclosed viewpoints afforded by a
piano and surrounded by cheesy or dangerous aspects of commodity America and
narrow "job force" rules, trying to buy sympathy like a drug-store product and
psychologically battered to the point of reducing themselves and each other to
retail objects -- is "weighted" with the tensions and releases of the music
itself, the pressurizations and subsequent points of relief.
These sessions didn't mark the first time Zappa
had conducted his orchestral music. As can be heard on 1996's The Lost
Episodes, a young Frank first undertook the role in '63 at Mount St. Mary's
College in L.A., leading a group of university musicians he'd scraped together.
The first recording of his instrumental music occurred two years before that in
a Cucamonga, California studio owned by electrical innovator Paul Buff. Pal
Studios was eventually renamed Studio Z when Frank took over the lease in '63
with the money he'd gotten for scoring a low-budget film called Run Home
Slow; the acquisition of the studio gave him his first solitary experiences
at a sound board. But at Pal in '61, an instrumental version of "Take Your
Clothes Off When You Dance" (first resurfacing as the closing music for Lumpy
Gravy and then appearing as a vocal number on We're Only In It For the
Money) was performed by some session musicians he'd found.
With Lumpy Gravy, Zappa invented an
unheard-of genre that could be called "refusal to contemplate genre." This was
unmarketable, striking perhaps the hardest blow against the
feelings-as-commodities and humans-as-products reality in the piece. Anything's
possible in composition, Frank argues in the above quote; why stick to one form
of music? Why snobbishly limit yourself? Rather than taking pains to celebrate
freedom, he simply acknowledges no alternative. The LP can be considered
"important" because it frees tape-collage from the elitist world of lofty
artists by placing it into the same context as simple pop tunes.
The album's title, originally gleaned from a
television commercial for Aloma Linda Gravy Quick, is probably used here as a
blunt term for the breaking-up of the "smooth" textures of popular orchestral
music (more than one kind of pop is ridiculed on the album!). Recycled classical
works are unobtrusive and "flawless" in their lack of emotional provocation. The
breaking-up's done by compositional freedom and intrusions of reality -- the
"lumps" of the imperfect real world. Zappa liked to cut through bullshit and
pretentiousness; the lumps are the "meat of the matter," to coin a common
saying, and also happen to be the tastiest part of the gravy.
A neat twist was imposed on the title seventeen
years later when Frank made a point about starving modern composers during his
speech to the American Society of University Composers. "Mostly what they eat,"
he stated, "is brown and lumpy."
The album has an overall rhythm that satisfies
that part of the mind not touched by fleeting pop ditties. Its appeal's partly
due to its cocksure smashing of conventional forms; it's like hearing someone
swear at the teacher or seeing someone knock the supervisor on his ass.
The ones [who] just really crave [my music]
-- maybe [it's] just because it touches them in a weird emotional way or a weird
intellectual way that they don't understand...but they like
it. (FZ in an
interview by Gary Steel in T'Mershi Duween, 9/91)
The front-cover photo, backdropped with
gravy-brown, features Zappa in a non-hip, comfortable outfit, staring up at the
spectator proudly from his chambers of creation like a worn-out worker after a
hard day. He's wearing a shirt occasionally aired onstage that advertises Pipco,
a Santa Barbara, California pipe company that has made shirts in sponsorship of
little-league teams (although Frank won't learn of the shirt's origins until
long after 1967). Except for this photo, the cover and gatefold present the
piece as a show or spectacle, ready to be consumed by the masses it
unflatteringly mirrors. The back cover shows the composer pining for the camera
in a magician-like formal outfit and top-hat, bowing with a held pair of gloves
and a cheesy grin. His speech bubble asks, "Is this phase 2 of: We're Only In
It For the Money?" Although that album will follow this one, this aural
collage does sound like a continuation of that study of restricted perspectives
and business-hyped fads that attract young minds like cattle feed. Twenty-seven
years later, Civilization Phaze III will conclude the story with the end
of the world, scary mock-humans worshipping and dancing around embodiments of
more trends, government-maintained myths and repressive trickery. Up through
this finale, the people will never leave the piano.
The inside of the Lumpy Gravy cover
continues on the spectacle theme with photos of people dancing formally in a
bygone era transposed on some Mothers in their future Money garb,
appealing sarcastically to the spectators with hippie-style friendliness. The
audience's penchant for tales of excess is lambasted by photos of Mothers posing
with nude clothing-store dummies, a hearkening to the plastic people of
Absolutely Free. An audience of Franks watches with frowns of skepticism.
He's pictured "exploring new territory" in an astronaut's suit, connected to the
whole album by a feed line (which is possibly congruous with a studio cable).
Among the credits and musicians' names, the liner notes include directions for
the thick-minded average consumer ("PARTS LIST: Side One. Side Two.") and the
promising demand, "NOTE: listen to side one first AND TURN IT ALL THE WAY UP!!"
The Chorus roster's marked with the scrawled instruction "omit last names,"
making them all similar piano citizens to fit the album's ethic of conformist
non-identity.
One of the dog-faced Mothers from the
up-and-coming Uncle Meat storybook (1969) peeks out from behind the
illustrations, thinking "Curses!" and looking in the direction of the Chorus
credits. As fans will learn from that book, the dog-like noses of the group in
these cartoons are necessary to fit their enlarged brains. The insinuation's
that anyone with a big brain would say "Curses!" to the idea of lost
individuality.
Zappa's "look behind the scenes" concept makes
its first illustrated appearance here: Schematics and blueprints share space
with studio photos of Frank and the musicians. In one picture, he shrewdly
exploits the kitsch-show concept to depict unfeigned appreciation for his
listeners, smiling genuinely and waving at the camera through the control-room
window.
"Lumpy Gravy Part One"
Zappa explored the LP medium's aesthetic potential
and made the manual nature of record-player access a fun and often fascinating
aspect of some compositions. We're Only In It For the Money played with
the randomness of the phonograph needle and teased listeners' impulsive craving
for predictable pop by making the stylus sound like it was jumping out of songs.
Lumpy Gravy tended to celebrate the format, the mainstream product
ironically being the countercultural composer's only means of reaching listeners
besides sporadic concerts.
The story that's gradually spelled out in the
dialogue (improvised within general guidelines provided by Frank from the
control room) deals with the horror and humor inherent in a cheapened,
commercially driven society and its psychologically cracked inmates. Having such
an ominous narrative goal makes the lighter moments on the album all the more
hilarious, like remarks that evoke nervous giggles at funerals. Zappa's slick
about providing the relief of absurd abandon. The humor nevertheless leaves a
dark taste in one's ear when the album's over and the full context felt. The
music shakes and shudders from battery by brief, loud pieces of marketed
Americana; to effect the desired balance between sarcasm and eerieness, Zappa
inserts bits of commodity music found on other such revolving products and seems
to ask us if this is what we'd rather hear. The album's even presented like a
cheesy stage-show from Vaudeville or Vegas.
Zappa's quote about "using the weapons of a
disoriented and unhappy society against itself" (see the Freak Out!
chapter) is applicable here, even though he was talking about the Mothers while
Lumpy Gravy's a solo album -- small print under the Orchestra's name on
the front cover says "With maybe even some of the Mothers of Invention." Unique,
feelable music that isn't commercially driven is indeed being made partly
of bits of the targets it satires, pointing out how ridiculous that financial
motivation is. Lumpy Gravy also serves as a compressed illustration of
all of Zappa's work in that it absolutely shatters the mythical "high/low"
divisions that smatter our music, art and society.
Ignoring the shuttered compartments favored by
the leash-trained and prejudiced ear, Zappa simply made music the way he liked
it and the way he wanted it heard. Exploration herein should therefore not be
confused with finite analysis, which is incidental to the free pleasure of
music. Besides promoting the fact that any individual's capable of composing or
creating something in his own right, and stressing defiance of categorization
and trend sects, Frank did amusing things to show us how easily something's
stamped "improper" by a ruling class that wants to keep its citizens in ordered
(and feuding) packets to detract from the big picture and discourage new ideas
that might expose or break down that ruling class. On Lumpy Gravy, he
fittingly chose piano-dweller dialogue involving two main things: working for a
living and hiding from predators.
We owe it to Zappa that the cliched chunks of
elevator music rampant in our environment -- deadwood market fulfillment ruining
orchestral music for many would-be listeners -- and the overdone formulas of
antiquated classical music, devoid of integrity and blueprinted by a ruling
class centuries ago, still haven't diminished the creative excitement felt by
thousands of current composers even as they occasionally work behind cash
registers or grease friers. In the ears of many fans, Frank has grabbed the
trapped art of uninhibited creation away from the elitist unimaginatives who
analyze it or fund it, and has bestowed it upon one of the more open-minded
parts of our culture: kids who like rock music.
The "cheap show" concept provides a sarcastic
introduction to the composition. The facetious statement of Spider Barbour (of
the band Chrysalis, also recording at Apostolic at the time) ribs the
non-commercial sounds of the imminent album, trying to pass it off as just
another family-friendly presentation. It's the very first thing we hear: "The
way I see it, Barry, this should be a very dynamite show!" Barry's not
identified in the Chorus, so he's probably an intentionally faceless cohost in a
mockery of cheesy TV "spectaculars"; Spider sounds like he's been directed by
Frank to talk as if reading from a cue-card.
Although the original release of Lumpy
Gravy listed only "Part One" and "Part Two," the reissue decades later broke
the halves down into "indexes" named by Frank for easier following. After
Spider's opening line, the main theme from Lumpy Gravy is conducted and
electric-guitar-laden by Zappa. It's listed under the title "The Way I See It,
Barry." It's certainly an ear-grabber, high-spirited like a break through the
starting gate; it's also a deliberately poppy evasion of any high-nosed views of
such a meticulously orchestrated album. This opening theme, which sounds like a
song from a surf-western (were there such a thing), will appear a few years
later in "Bwana Dik," a song about a guy's fixation with the size of his penis
from the touring stories that will make up the 200 Motels movie. Rather
than appearing on the soundtrack record, it'll be heard live on the Fillmore
East, June 1971 album. Sneaking a reprise of the main theme of an album
dealing in part with the perversion of the male mind in a society of dictated
appeal into a song about a guy's view of his genitals is pretty slick.
"Duodenum" doesn't slap us with the violent
sounds appearing later on the album, but it's stunning anyway in its somewhat
surprisingly uncynical beauty, setting the scene outside the piano with a
gorgeous sunrise and then breaking into an awkward trot amongst chiming vibes,
introducing us to the cerebrally lazy job-force fugitives we'll soon hear
conversing.
The aspect of cheesy commercial music -- i.e.
the vibes, still hanging around after their appearance in the Mothers' first
song, "Hungry Freaks, Daddy," itself a put-down of the "great Midwestern
hardware store" -- makes this slow second half of the short "duo" of musical
feelings an early scolding of mass-produced thought. The duodenum's the highest
segment of the small intestine, right below the stomach. The point is that
Americans have to digest some ridiculous things (adding a pretty yucky twist to
the term "Lumpy Gravy"). The album's closing comment, "Round things are boring,"
will be fully explored later, but the hole-boring ants on the cover of 1975's
One Size Fits All cast light on a potential reason for the title
"Duodenum": Is the round record boring like a bug into the authority-hypnotized
audience? Is lumpy gravy the diarrhea of this positive intrusion, superficially
gross but undeniably human?
The snippet leads right into "Oh No," the
Muzak-sounding version of a vocal song that will appear on the 1970 collection
of after-the-fact Mothers material Weasels Ripped My Flesh. The lyrics
will deal with popular ideas of love propagated in the late '60s as opposed to
real love, bashing the hippies. Lumpy Gravy's presented as a tie-in to
the put-down We're Only In It For the Money. The conformist workers in
the piano apparently also buy into the trends of the day; the "Oh No" reprise
later on the album concludes a conversation about "switching girls," which
features a guy comparing broken relationships to broken cars. "Oh No"'s other
version's lyrics sneering at hippies tie the view of women as objects alongside
our other advertised commodities into the hippies' "free love" concept.
Zappa's later songs about sexual adventures
come off like a fascinated anthropologist's studies of our society's twisted
view of the human body. Since he makes it a point to include a lot of sex in his
later lyrics, he seems to be saying, "Look at sex the way you really feel, not
the way the media tells you to. Do what you want to do as an individual -- don't
let any trendy school of thought tell you that promiscuity's either a triumph or
a vulgarity. Do your own thing." A more direct bottom line's definitely, "It's
not dirty. It's human." Our ashamedness and taboo-like mystique concerning the
human body makes it seem dirty, creating a multimillion-dollar pornography
industry and warping sexual feelings and self-esteem. Insecurity about not
meeting trumpeted standards drives men to fixate primarily on "conquests"
whether they think things like "free love" are right for them or not. This is a
package deal, so to speak, and comes complete with penis-size preoccupation and
the treatment of women as objects like cars.
Music that ignores "proper" composing
principles and incorporates any sounds at all (and which is sometimes referred
to as avant-garde or musique concrete) will be called "free music"
throughout the remainder of this book to avoid the repetition of lengthy
clarifications like this one.
A neat sound effect interrupts the too-pleasant
"Oh No" with deliberate rudeness, belching or farting into the score from what
sounds like a wet plastic tube being growled-through. We then hear either the
scraping of an object against a cymbal or someone blowing through a straw (more
round things). Spider follows up on this prank: "A bit o' nostalgia for the old
folks!" A snippet of surf-music guitar introduces "Bit of Nostalgia."
Zappa always lambasted the regurgitation of
trends (see the FZ quote concerning nostalgia in the Cruising With Ruben
& the Jets section), our cultural fixation on making old profit-driven
crazes into sentimental yardsticks. "Bit of Nostalgia" presents on the assumed
stage a past Americanism and then comments on it with a series of aural shocks
that slam inventiveness down on it like a gavel. Piano-dwellers laugh wildly at
the listner's (or their own) gullibility in being drawn into the surf hook, and
they make snorking sounds amid the composer's dare to the listener as he gives
the record a hard spin. We then hear metallic clanks, either factory sounds or
insistent independent thought, and then some mock-climactic horror-movie piano
chords are pounded out obnoxiously, the western music-business mind lamenting
the death of the surf tune with another musical archetype. Then we're inside the
piano, zooming in on one particular limited perspective. With a final,
sarcastically melodramatic piano chord, the jolts and scratches concluding "Bit
of Nostalgia" are neutralized by stupidity as the characters talk amongst
themselves about the world outside and how they fit into it: The static-laden
metallic music's cut short by the exchange of dialogue entitled "It's From
Kansas."
Gilly Townley, the sister of Apostolic's owner,
indicates her peers' needs for graspable trends by kicking off the album's first
exchange with "I'm advocating dark clothes." Dark and light will return later on
the album and then mutate into metaphors for open- and closed- (clouded-) minded
states on Civilization Phaze III. (The subtext of racism should be
eschewed; it's the least likely conveyance Frank intended with the "dark vs.
light" motif.)
Monica, the studio's receptionist, seems to
wake up from her own preoccupations, startled by Gilly into realizing that she's
not as unique as she thought: "If I'm not alone...how long have I been asleep?"
Zappa's editing here is brilliant, showing that both of these girls are
herd-followers and want to stay awake and caught up with whatever's hip, and
that they both occupy the ignorance-maintaining confines of the piano: Gilly
answers, "As long as I have."
A vague shadow of the musical exasperation we
heard before now clouds behind the sounds of the voices: A very low instrument
makes this metaphorical look at society into a flesh-creep for the listener as
Monica typically wonders about other compartments of people, the sky looking
bluer to her on the other side of the fence but appearing just as suffocating
from the vantage point the composer's given us: "Did you ever live in a drum?"
When Gilly says that she hasn't, Monica tries to salvage a sense of
individuality or at least self-importance, avoiding the admission of how
typecast her persona is: "Well, then, you aren't me!" Gilly admits that the
darkness of the piano (contrast the ominous atmosphere here with the sunny
beginning of "Duodenum") did make her dream she was in a drum.
Individuality seems out of reach for this participant in social doctrine; even
her mind's imaginative side, which harbors a subconscious bid for fantasy, is
affected by the climate. She's inside a drum even when she's dreaming. Monica
qualifies, "Dreaming is hard." Something that should feel natural produces
self-doubt.
The piano wires ring in conversational
reverberation as a discussion about the need for something over the head, the
protection and validation of a group or image, ensues. A third girl has joined
in. The ringing's softest when the idea's brought up about leaving the piano and
putting behind this narrow outlook. But nobody seems to know what's outside the
dictated frame of existence until Spider wakes up and reveals what it's like out
there, living without the shelter of a caste: dark. Nobody's shedding light on
things for him, telling him where to go or even how to think and act. Instead of
perceiving this freedom, he admits to All-Night John (the studio manager) that
pure paranoia keeps his universe from expanding. His "water" stays dark, a
metaphor that John's brought up. Spider keeps this murky perspective all over
him in order to avoid danger. This is ironic in light of the angle Zappa
provides on dangerous authoritarian mind-control. The mention of paranoia also
connects to the druggie parody that the conversations might suggest; Spider's
proclamation that he's feeling something so typically associated with being
stoned makes him sound like he revels in being typecast by his friends.
Moreover, the water in his "washing machine" is dark because it's sympathetic;
it's home to him, understanding his fears and the reasons for which he's
yielded.
Sympathy's another commodity in this cheap
culture: Spider tells John that it can be found at the local drug store. Even
emotions have been relegated to the factory line of people making up the world
that these folks inhabit. This continues later as relationships, girls and cars
take on equal weight as packaged items.
When John asks how much the sympathy costs,
Spider's indirect answer is "It's from Kansas," introducing the segment named
likewise. Spider has simply chosen a place he knows nothing about, hoping that
somewhere in the Midwest, stereotypically known as barren and unfashionable,
some sincere feelings might exist. This exotic sympathy's been imported.
The "dynamite show" motif returns as "It's From
Kansas" blares out joyride music, the trumpets bouncing along like they don't
know what kind of album they're on. The product isn't genuine; the tune plays
faster than it was recorded. The sympathy's just another shabbily concocted,
instantly available product, displayed along with the headache remedies and diet
books at the store; the music here reflects this hilariously. If it wasn't meant
to be enjoyed as neat music, of course, Frank wouldn't have written it. Songs
within an overall concept can also be enjoyable as individual items; the way he
pulls off these separate entertainments simultaneously is one of the reasons his
stuff hits the ear so powerfully.
Some heart-pulling free music made up of
Frank's percussive tides and crashes interrupts the horns, beginning "Bored Out
90 Over." Motorhead interjects the title, which describes an auto engine and
provides the first hint that the term "boring" from later on the album indicates
more than mere dullness. The percussion takes on a surfy 4:4 rhythm similar to
that in Freak Out!'s "The Return of the Son of Monster Magnet." With the
popular beat, the parodies of marketed music on Freak Out! return to
haunt us. We can connect the defeat of the percussion over the horns to the
Mothers' 1966 infiltration of (and boring into) society, turning that society's
own weapons against it.
More free music, mostly percussive, blows a
strong gale over the factory shelves; things are knocked off cabinets and some
destruction's caused to perplex the good little numbered citizens who stand by.
Zappa doesn't let them clock in; the whine of the breeze holds them at bay as
they're shown what should really be done to their habitat. The trumpets are
therefore revealed to be a lure; the infiltration method's entertaining in
itself. This upsetting musical storm has been the sneaky end to the baiting
snippet of commodity music all along.
Towards the end of the segment, the wind starts
to catch electric cables, ripping them from the walls; the wrong one's tripped
and a damn funny bit of Oriental music bursts out. Roy Estrada plays the part of
the easily enthralled spectator: "Almost Chinese, huh!" The bit of silence
before the remark brings us a step back from the snatch of music, making the
words even funnier. We hear applause from like-minded people and grunting pigs
(reeking of the herd concept on the album). If the pigs in Lumpy Gravy's
plot are truly the authorities they're later insinuated as, Zappa's putting the
initiators of this silly culture's elements in with the gullible morons they
govern; their tastes are no different.
More pranky snorks begin "Almost Chinese," and
are immediately followed by Motorhead's declaration, "'Cause I was makin', uh,
$2.71 an hour," previewing his monologue later on the album-side. The Chinese
surf music indicates another element of the commercial destruction of musical
freedom: the uninformed, prejudicial way in which we're trained to view other
cultures. The ruling class discourages ideas that might threaten it; we have to
be made to regard other peoples as "wrong." The cheap music derides the ways in
which we stereotype foreign cultures and how we're made to glimpse only tiny
packets of other civilizations. The surf progression behind the Oriental
flavoring is both an obvious reprise of the album's earlier sneer and a joke
about how we like to Americanize everything we hear. Some sped-up snorking and
coughing tries to eject the bad-tasting pseudo-Chinese music from the body,
which isn't accepting what's been distilled into the duodenum for hopeful
digestion. Simultaneously, "real" human sounds are turned into music.
"Switching Girls" begins with Motorhead's rant
equating women with products, namely cars; the marketplace stranglehold,
mind-dulling work ethic (his priority is "$2.71 an hour") and endorsement of
fashion herds all serve to warp sexuality and self-image, making sex both an
acquired instant service and a requisite flaunting. Many of the album's previous
sociological points thus merge.
Zappa can strike fear into the listener
alongside humor better than any cheap horror movie can. The commercialization of
life can even permeate a man's feelings for a woman. Any chance of mental
initiative during youth is discouraged by media-fueled typecasting. Cars and
girls are often seen together; the way we're brought up equates them in
male-fulfillment importance. We'll hear a young man thinking the same way in
Uncle Meat's "Dog Breath, in the Year of the Plague." Frank will also
show us just how cheap our view of relationships has gotten with the
Ruben album.
"Oh No Again" reprises that song after
"Switching Girls" ends with sped-up "dynamite show" instrumental phrases. Girls
are dancing plastic dolls on this stage. This spiffy follow-up on the earlier
tune switches rhythmic meters toward the end, making it now more attractive than
cheesy, although the over-grand strings and horns achieve an extremely sarcastic
climax.
For "At the Gas Station," Motorhead gets in the
spotlight with his participant's-eye view of the robotic work force. The
unsettling thing's that nothing would seem out of order here if the job stories
weren't placed in the context of the album. "Another Pickup" is named after his
last remark -- it may as well be "Another Girl," especially considering that
girls are "picked up" -- and treats us to some funny, catchy "rough-ridin'"
music before "Lumpy Gravy Part One" ends with the unexpected optimism of
creative victory: Frank's longest stretch of free music to appear on an album so
far.
After the honking harmonica of "Another
Pickup," the free music of "I Don't Know If I Can Go Through This Again" grips
the listener in its contrastingly unique air and serves to clear the heart of
all we've heard, preparing us to engage part two of the album by prefacing it
with a musical view instead of the absurd sociological one with which we've been
battered.
This breathtaking segment's named as such
because of All-Night John's comment on having to hear more examples of his own
conformity. It's also possibly one of Frank's self-deprecating jokes about his
"weird" music. The segment cuts into the free music concluding "Another Pickup"
with some orchestration at least as lovely as the beginning of "Duodenum." It in
turn is interrupted by free music. The two become intertwined as the piece goes
on. One doesn't get the feeling of any impending aural punchline here.
The fascinating way in which this phase plays
with one's mind explains the "craving" Zappa spoke of in the earlier quote.
Snorks are given as much musical weight as sped-up piano; attractive snare rolls
give way to dramatic horn diatonics emphasized with rumbling thunder; enticing
woodwinds explore this world that could be beautiful. Sped-up cabaret music also
relinquishes to compelling diatonics; the "show" ethic is more fun when used as
a compositional ingredient rather than a general setting. Scary tornados of
wet-sounding percussion lead into the death-rattle of teeth (discussed in the
Ruben section); a pretty, haunting piano bestows some sympathy (but not
the kind from Kansas) for its brainwashed occupants. A foreboding final chord
elicits fear for the characters as they prepare to tackle the pigs and ponies in
the second act.
"Lumpy Gravy Part Two"
Nearly every segment on the album is
immediately contrasted by a joke or abrupt musical change. The piece comments on
itself throughout. The angle-shift's occasionally more gradual: In the first
half, Motorhead's materialistic anecdotes in "Another Pickup" come to be
balanced by humor as a supportive gathering of brain-dead guys increases in
volume. Their macho commentating deals with cars and musical artists as they
float from the right speaker to the left. One hard-to-discern utterance even
interrupts Motorhead early on for a second in its enthusiastic affirmation of
the ambiguous "lubing" subject. This transforms the disheartening robot-worker
subtext into an aloof jeer. In the same manner, part two's opener, "Very
Distraughtening," reveals the first half's wonderful conclusion as a mere
breather; the mind drops out of the free realm and back into the cramped piano.
The characters duly sound even more moronic
than before. The return to the herd of dumb men is introduced with a loud
"ba-BOMP-BODDY!" that sounds like a drunk guy trying to sing along with the
hokey mainstream music that's been darting in. With the release of the
posthumous The Lost Episodes in 1996, this voice will reveal itself as a
snippet of "Ronnie Sings?," a recording of Frank's boyhood friend Ronnie
Williams making rough-throated scat sounds to Frank's guitar accompaniment in an
Ontario living room in 1961 or '62. Ronnie's booger-saving and fart-lighting
affinities are among the subjects of "Let's Make the Water Turn Black" on the
Money album, that song also cutting momentarily to the voice. Its
inclusion on that counterpart album to Lumpy Gravy makes Ronnie and the
other piano inhabitants pre-Haight models -- products of programmed western
ignorance and bad parenting, like the young walking calamities in "Mom &
Dad" and "The Idiot Bastard Son."
The voice figures into the plot as a "little
pig with wings" (although sounding more like an emphysemic sheep). The pig will
fly around the piano again on Civilization Phaze III. In the early '70s,
Zappa will record a long comical piece called "The Adventures of Greggery
Peccary," concerning a pig who sits in an office and comes up with trends for
the world's youth to buy into. The flying pig in "Very Distraughtening" is
constantly haunting the piano tenants, and they remain at a loss as to what it's
doing or whether it's even affecting them. After John identifies the creature,
Spider says, "I hear you've been having trouble with pigs and ponies" in his
best official-sounding voice, prefaced by a comical "Yi!" and followed by the
sound of a door slamming or the pig bonking against the piano's inner surface.
Obvious "us against them" connotations exist in
the inhabitants' fear of all of these animals, especially since pigs are among
the creatures ("pigs" of course being hip slang for "cops" and probably used
here in broad governmental terms). The animal references were most likely
initiated by the composer, since he was often giving suggestions over the studio
intercom; but the players' improvisations rendered most of the actual dialogue.
Both the pigs and the ponies threaten any pianist (if you will) who meddles with
them. The pigs represent unfair control and the ponies, while also feared by the
main characters, are confronted by the pigs. The ponies are possibly ignorants
in other societal compartments. In "Part Two," we'll hear clues that they may be
American soldiers.
"Lumpy Gravy Part Two" -- or at least most of
it, one would think -- was singled out by Frank as his favorite part of the
album, referred to as "Pigs and Ponies" although this general title doesn't
appear as a subdivision in the reissue's track listing.
"Pigs and Ponies" really says what I wanted
it to say and the performance is as good as I could have hoped for. It is 100%
of what I'd
intended. (FZ in
1968 as quoted in A Visual Documentary by Miles)
After the first two voices are interrupted by
the slamming sound, All-Night John says something that closely resembles "What
about us? Don't we get any?," the loudest complaint typically heard in our
commodity culture, in which people are made to believe that certain possessions
are important and enviable. The class-envy topic will arise frequently in future
Zappa songs. John's complaints are backed up by the others; sirens and clanks
ring in one speaker and then the other (the "official" guy making a commotion to
feign concern?) as the voices, heard likewise, follow up on the greed with "Just
the opposite...we don't get any...that's very distraughtening."
"We don't get any because we're otherwise" is
voiced by one of the girls as the clanging gets louder. Then it stops with a
thunk -- perhaps someone's closed another varnished, wooden portal to the
confusing outside world (or someone out there has done it to stop the noise) --
and we hear a conversation rife with musical metaphors taking place between two
stoned-sounding inhabitants as the mic zooms in again on a specific part of the
group.
Frank's repeatedly making the listener a
perceptive, intelligent antithesis to these characters, and the whole picture's
often seen from different angles. This is a common aspect of his music anyway;
while the listener's made to feel, in the interest of education, that he too is
guilty of some of the laughable traits of the characters, a vantage point's
presented that compliments the fan who really listens by giving him the role of
the aware person with whom these anthropological discoveries are being shared.
"White Ugliness" is a hilarious term for Zappa,
classic R&B aficionado, to pick as a track title featuring two easily sold
Americans.
Many compositions that have been accepted as
"GREAT ART" through the years reek of these HATEFUL PRACTICES... Tin Pan
Alley songs and jazz standards thrive on [the chord progression] II-V-I. To me,
this is a HATEFUL PROGRESSION... II-V-I is the essence of bad "WHITE-PERSON
MUSIC." (The
Real Frank Zappa Book)
Zappa had also never liked what white singers
(i.e. Elvis) did to certain black songs.
Spider's explanation of existence at the end of
"Very Distraughtening" (which serves as an introductory speech to the "White
Ugliness" part of the conversation) about the universe being one big note,
ultimately repeated (with originally excluded bits stuck back in) on
Civilization Phaze III, could well be taken as a characterized angle on
an abstract truth as Zappa sees it, since we hear in the later version that he
proffers the idea from the control room. But in the piano-gang context, it also
serves as a parody on the "enlightened" status with which druggies are ordained
by themselves and their peers, especially in Lumpy Gravy's era. The
characters' ignorance continues to be exposed, element by element.
When we celebrate Ignorance and make that the
National Standard of Excellence, we embarrass ourselves. We celebrate it in hit
records, TV sitcoms, most films, most commercials and, to a great extent, in our
schools. [Separately:] Corporate policy (itself
fueled by drugs and alcohol) has decreed the breeding and maintenance of
hundreds of millions of helpless illiterates, destined to spend their lives
buying useless
shit. (Ibid.)
As Spider talks about the "big note" that
everything makes up, the concept possibly being included as a sly comment on
Zappa's conceptual continuity, he touches on the fact that the good guys and the
bad are made of the same essential stuff and are simply trained against one
another. Ordaining this kind of character with flashes of insight is the
composer's middle finger at the authorities and influences that keep everyone as
ignorant as possible; one of his axioms is that there's hope in the individual
human spirit (200 Motels's "Strictly Genteel" chimes "God bless the mind
of the man in the street," Zappa affecting indifference to his own atheism in
the interest of universal identification), no matter how far gone some of the
Western World's occupants might appear.
Catching the intellectual paradox quickly off
its "all men are created equal" bounce, a girl says "You mean, just we
know that!" It's either Monica, Maxine or Becky (other "girls from Apostolic,"
as the credits read) continuing with the unwitting bashing of "heightened
consciousness." Spider replies with a dry "right" that's pure comedy.
Like many of the other bits of dialogue, this
exchange is followed by some abrupt, harsh music as "Very Distraughtening"
crashes to a close, forming a transition from its "big note" theme into the
attack recount in "White Ugliness." Spider's "right" is immediately belched-on,
and then the speedy percussive debris of his words, once again illustrating the
dialogue's confused thought processes with the warped senses of Zappa's
imaginative sounds, whirls around from speaker to speaker while more electric
shorts occur in this big, mock-factory-made show machine that's presenting the
album for us. The boundary between Lumpy Gravy's creative spectacle and
real life is breaking down, becoming more transparent as the characters'
ignorance and behavior appear so consistently reflective of people we know or
are. The spectators in 1984's Thing-Fish gradually talk like the twisted
main characters to reveal a similar convergence.
Another voice of commodity America appears
amidst the white noise, the indecipherable but unmistakable sound of a voice on
a radio with bad reception. The sound's instant familiarity points out the
listener's habitual consumption of radio. "Lonely Little Girl" from We're
Only In It For the Money is catchy enough to be a teaser that illuminates
our tendancies toward formulated sounds; is this Lumpy Gravy snippet a
slick reference to "It's His Voice on the Radio" (the alternate title of that
song)?
The sound fades into the left channel. In the
eye of this noise-storm, Zappa's guitar intro from the Money album
appears in longer but sped-up form -- it even sounds here like the guitar on
"Lonely Little Girl," all but cementing this one of many connections between the
albums -- in a backward, Eastern-sounding comment on Hendrix's tone to continue
on the theme of fashionable '60s iconology (Zappa nevertheless admired Jimi, and
he's on the Money album cover in a tributary fashion). Spider then blasts
Californian youth in spite of himself by mocking its sillier music and one of
its catch phrases, "doing your thing": "Merry-go-'round, merry-go-'round...and
they call that 'doing their thing.'" John replies bemusedly, "Oh, yeah?
That's what 'doing your thing' is!" The so-called revolutionary youth of
America can't even get it together among themselves to understand each other's
vernacular.
Before Louie interjects with his loud story to
Roy Estrada, Spider concludes, "The thing is to put a motor in yourself." This
reference to robotic servitude, and its comparison to a merry-go-'round, the
subject of a supposedly "do your own thing"-type song -- not to mention the
"motor" throwback to Motorhead's mindset -- will spawn the opening piece on
Civilization Phaze III.
This was also a bit of a self-deprecating joke
on Frank's part; "Merry-Go-'Round" was a song by Wild Man Fischer, a discovery
of Frank's who'd eventually record the tune for an album on Zappa's label. A
funny farm ex-con, Larry Fischer's songs were simplistic nursery rhymes with
solitary musical ideas (a precursor to Washington's post-punk K Records and the
"childlike" ethics of bands like Beat Happening, who influenced local peers like
Nirvana).
In his book, Zappa explains how one of the guys
came to be in the Chorus:
Another regular [at the Garrick Theater
concerts in New York, 1967] was a guy we called "Louie the Turkey" -- because of
his laugh. His real name was Louis Cuneo. He wound up on the Lumpy Gravy
album as one of the people talking about incomprehensible stuff, inside a
piano. We would always know when Louie was in
the theater because we could hear him in the back of the room. I would invite
him onstage, give him a stool to sit on, hand him the microphone and stop the
music. He would sit there and laugh -- AT NOTHING -- and the whole audience
would laugh with him for five minutes. Then we thanked him and he'd
leave. (Ibid.)
Louie's excited recount of white ponies trying
to kill him and his valiant defense and escape ends up as a joke as he talks
about picking up sticks to throw at his assailants and Roy interrupts with
"Pickup Sticks?" which refers back to the groping for innocence in
"Merry-Go-'Round" (and of course the title of "Another Pickup"). Louie humors
him with "Did you ever play that game? That [the exchange] was funny!" and
laughs like a turkey.
Status "races" are now mentioned, like the
President and the Pope, and the reference to a cigar in a deliberate-sounding
Freudian jibe points back to the sexual dilemmas of "Another Pickup" and the
instrumental precursor to "Bwana Dik." Louie and Roy are scared of what's
outside, so amidst nervous laughter they pray for safety; but the separations
get even more narrow as Roy says, "You do yours and I'll do mine" as an
edit-composer's comment on the ludicrousness of organized religion (like the
prior mention of the Pope and some appealing religious bashing on
Civilization Phaze III, among other albums). What they're concerned about
is Motorhead's safety; he's apparently ventured outside their compartment, or
possibly even the piano. A brief mention of pimples adds physical
self-consciousness to the makeup of these media victims, tying nicely into the
kitschy "showtime" ethic. Frank probably didn't mind Roy asking, "Did it have
teeth?" after Louie said "White ugliness" (see the Ruben chapter). Such
coincidental dialogue goes a long way toward explaining why Zappa liked this
part of the album.
With Roy's "Amen" (thrusting the name of the
studio, Apostolic, into conceptual continuity), the segment so-titled begins.
Its initial rhythmic fulcrum's a tambourine pointing at the Eastern-sounding
beat in Money's "Who Needs the Peace Corps?" Anchored in the right
speaker for a while, it darts to the left before sneaking back for this bit's
conclusion. A sped-up (or high-pitched), fretless-sounding bass gives us an
early whiff of Zappa's upcoming compositional base of jazz/rock; accessibly
structured bass patterns will make a real introduction in Uncle Meat's
version of "King Kong" and continue into the early seventies. "Little Umbrellas"
on 1969's Hot Rats, "Get a Little" on 1970's Weasels Ripped My
Flesh and "Twenty Small Cigars" on Chunga's Revenge from that year
are all instrumentals whose titles contain "little" references, making one
wonder why Frank attaches low notes to smallness. Is it a reference to the
lurking evil people in the world, poorly endowed with brains or other things?
The liquid bass sounds in this first part of
"Amen" will make three further long, occasionally improvisational appearances
that especially stand out as culminations of the jazz-bass of Zappa's late-'60s
period. The first is "Big Swifty" on 1972's Waka/Jawaka: Is this
advertising agency full of low, little people too? Pigs, even? A peccary's such
an animal, a specialized version of the generalized swine on the Lumpy
Gravy album. The other pieces are "Blessed Relief" and "The Grand Wazoo" on
the '72 album of which the latter's the title track, originally named after
another power-bent character. The Big Swifty agency and the Grand Wazoo will
even join up in Grand Wazoo concerts, during which bits of the future
"Adventures of Greggery Peccary" (who works at Big Swifty) are played by the
brass section. It's the "Who is making those new brown clouds?" refrain in
"Peccary," indicating one of the many problems caused by these sorts of small
people.
The bass won't subsequently make such similarly
slippery sounds until "Friendly Little [!] Finger" on 1976's Zoot
Allures. It comes full-circle (if you'll pardon the expression) in "Rubber
Shirt" on Sheik Yerbouti in '79, sounding almost like the same recording
as the high sliding in "Amen" despite its new presence in this edit-fabricated
piece.
The tambourine provides a loose frame. The
drums are most likely played by Frank himself. It all sounds less like factory
clutter than the percussive equivalent to the blundering characters' dialogue
and personalities. In the left speaker, we notice, one of the sound's elements
has gotten stuck. It malfunctions quietly and comically like a neglected little
animal in the corner. It quivers in its attempts to start working again. So much
for the full spectacle. It's a compositional smirk at the possibility of a part
of this silly society suddenly losing face and revealing itself to be rubbish.
The effect's achieved by an electric guitar, a harpsichord or some plucked piano
or cello strings.
Another tambourine's added to escalate the
short-circuit, and then a multiple cymbal-crash initiates a different view of
the mess, the second half of "Amen." Dissonant horns and strings sound like an
alleyway murder off a corrupted street. The rumble changes from the din of
idiots to the sounds of dangerous masterminds.
And so the evil revelation closing this
religiously titled segment rumbles to a weeping stop, the sound now stripped of
all but the sympathetic horror of a drawn-out chord of horns and strings. Its
suspense doesn't let the ear down; a horrible incident of some sort is marked by
a quick, jarring drum fill. Its aftermath's a chilling snippet of music. This
living, helpless result of wicked intentions fades in and out in pitch and
volume, a superbly executed pulsation of images that sounds like impossibly
conducted backward music.
A high tom or conga laughs humorlessly at
everything with a sudden bonk. A single right-channel woodblock pop compliments
this abrupt turn of timbre with ugly cuteness. An organ or clavier adds a
misplaced bit of carnival air left over from the stage-show intentions with a
left-channel punctuation, setting off a lumbering series of instrumental
comments from keys, drums, woodblocks and the sliding bass. Rats scurry to
reconvene for further corruptive strategy. They're the ones saying
"Amen."
Building cymbals and instruments rise to a
mock-dramatic finale. "Just One More Time" adds startling but much-needed
hilarity, relighting the stage that the real world's been placed on by
product-pushers -- perhaps the ultimate point of the album's tongue-in-cheek
"dynamite show" facade. The brash smirks of the Captain probably come from
Studio Z circa 1963; the vocal's similar to what's heard in the jams on The
Lost Episodes.
Beefheart's line "Come on, boys" makes his
closer, "Just one more time," seem to call the dorky characters back to converse
some more. The final organ note's replaced by a snork that reflects the cast's
antics near the beginning of the album. "Just One More Time"'s small bit of
dialogue begins, another snippet that will be repeated in the wider context of
"clouded mind" metaphors on Civilization Phaze III. Here, it touches the
tip of the iceberg on the clouds of smoke -- empowered people's closed outlooks
-- and how their music, as Spider says to John and one of the Apostolic girls,
has a dense, impenetrable light and keeps the smoke stationary; the pigs can't
question what they do, or everything on which their livelihoods are based will
break up (they are, after all, "only in it for the money"). Spider refers to
"that thing on their neck," a precursor to the tie markings on Greggery.
If the ponies move, their growing hair will
apparently upset the smoke. John's reply is, "That's the basis of all their
nationalism. Like, if they can't salute the smoke [thus moving their heads]
every morning when they get up..." This makes a strong argument for the ponies
being military personnel, voluntarily trained but every bit as culturally
enslaved as the piano's tenants.
Spider qualifies him: "Yeah, it's a vicious
circle. You got it." The phrase "vicious circle" figures into the multitude of
indications in the album's last line, "Round things are boring." Like
governmental vicious circles? Boring indeed, despite the dangers. And possibly
boring into the consciousness of impressionable young minds.
"A Vicious Circle" begins with sped-up horns
and drums providing the musical equivalent of the narrow, self-absorbed comedy
of such a circle. A close circle of associates, like at Big Swifty, could also
be perceived as vicious in their uncaring, often surprisingly ruthless agendas.
Fast bass or guitar joins the design, and John attempts to engage one of the
less evil-looking members in either a fight or a talk: "Pony!" he addresses, to
no avail. It just stirs them up more.
With a few more high clunks and clanks, an
electronic sound like the switching of a picture at a slide show sparks quickly,
and some relatively calm horns and strings prelude a Motown-like bass guitar
phrase that segues the album into "King Kong." The title of this first outing of
the album-side-long Uncle Meat piece points to Zappa's lifelong
fascination with cheap horror movie monsters. Mr. Kong lumbers about in a slow,
heavy groove that sounds like the least sarcastic material on the album that
isn't free music.
This incarnation of the tune, consisting of
drums, bass and sax-dominated brass, is in 4:4 instead of the gliding swing of
the upcoming longer version. Bunk's credited as part of the horn section. This
"showtime in Detroit" funk fanfare grooves along for a short while before the
creature does some tripping and stumbling in annotated free-music form, the same
instruments being joined by subtle piano trickles. It sounds as if the monster's
gotten drunk on the way home from a ruthless day at the office.
Roy Estrada interjects, "Drums are too noisy
when you got no corners to hide in." A loud drum can be considered a vicious
circle. The line kicks off "Drums Are Too Noisy." A humorously dramatic
snare-strings-and-horn movie phrase (concluding the horror film ethic) comments
on the statement, and then this segment's banter begins. All-Night John's
planning an offensive against some of the animals, poking fun at the 1960s'
inept words of revolution. A new animal's mentioned: A guy and a girl say "Oh
no, man, kangaroos?" There apparently exist more kinds of bad guys than
one can keep up with. One of the girls is now edited-in: "And then they eat it
when they get home." John retorts, "If it's still alive." Another force has
risen that both the piano inhabitants and the prior hostile animals have to deal
with, making their feuds almost moot in the hopelessness of it all (and
these creatures have built-in pockets!).
"Kangaroos" is an ebbing piece of music pitting
gliding bowed strings and dark horns against plucked staccato notes. The sneaky
attack of the animals on the victims' psyches slips, rises and falls in lovely
rhythmic tides before Spider flicks the inner wall of the piano and explains
that the battle's even overtaking the hiding dwellers as they wade in their dark
water: "...envelops the bathtub!"
The definition of "envelops" (no latter E)
probably represents one way Zappa looked at his surrounding-the-listener mixing
of multiple environments (he seized upon the short-lived idea of quadrophonic
stereo in the early '70s and suggested a six-speaker set-up as the ideal way to
hear his orchestral pieces, actually using such a mix from which to turn 1993's
Yellow Shark album into its final, two-channel format). A piece called
"Envelopes" (with the E) was eventually played in both an orchestral arrangement
and a rock one. This was possibly a joke on the common mispronunciation of the
earlier title.
"Envelops the Bath Tub" begins the stretch of
transfixing orchestration that closes Lumpy Gravy before its sarcastic,
quite jarring conclusion brackets everything in Showtime Americana. Some
offensive horn lines from the pigs' permeating presence quack self-righteous
drama into the scene from the right channel, joined by another "low, little"
puddle of sneakiness as murky bassoons appear to the left. Bits of the machine,
wires ruined in recent events, ring and fizzle in the distance with eerie
echoes, and then a lonely horn gives us our overview of this wasteland, a
pitying but disgusted line that's eventually complimented by a wistful string
section. Drum plunks -- falling bits of debris -- continue at the distant end of
the environment as dental percussion mocks with its harbinging of the impersonal
and image-irrelevant Grim Reaper. Plucked low strings jut up occasionally from a
place much closer to the ear: attempts by the kangaroo battle's various victims
to stir, to get a word in about all this uncalled-for creativity. The listener's
made to creep around the site. Comely clangs gain a fixed rhythmic presence in
the right speaker, imaging the inevitability of a funeral or a soulless march in
servitude to the victors (the kangaroos, the pigs or even angels of death,
ultimately triumphant over all, making societal hang-ups moot and dumb).
The bells now kick into a lopsided march.
Woodwinds make the marchers sound like drunken puppets; the evil in the shadows
of the left channel now asserts itself more. A refined waltz answers it, rife
with the squeaks of nervy protestors or yelps of pain as they're whipped back
into line.
The march halts suddenly, bells and marimbas
now conversing. The waltzing march starts up again in lurches, pausing
occasionally to deal with little incidents. The strings bow a dark climax as we
hear more skull-chattering. Gongs and dissonant strings comment fearfully. It
all echoes off into the fading, eerily quiet air of intermittent drums,
woodwinds and clangs. And as we find out on Zoot Allures, "The Torture
Never Stops."
All-Night John's remark about everything we've
heard is "'Cause round things, uh, are boring." It's the concluding declaration
of the whole piece, the last statement before the exhibition machine takes over
again. It's chilling when considered in the larger context in which this edit
takes place.
The first boring "round thing" to be considered
is the repetitiveness of menial work and its striving to meet the bottom lines
of supply and demand (i.e. in round-record factories). Pop music has circular,
repetitious beats. Zappa found purely commercial stuff, the stuff on the radio
that he attacked with the MOI, boring in light of the sheer possiblities offered
by music. The round record is a mass-produced item. We can think back to the
empowered people's self-enraging melee of insecurity and animosity in "A Vicious
Circle": This round thing's boring (dull) in its closed-minded (dark-clouded)
pattern. Fad-based symbols heard in youth dialect -- merry-go-'rounds -- are
uninspired. We can also think of the round zeroes indicating the wasteland
insinuated on the 1974 album Apostrophe (') (each of the first few lines
ends with the "o" sound). Frozen vistas abound, and there's always the "vigorous
circular motion" (the reduction of society into a barren plain is relentless)
performed by Nanook the Eskimo as he rubs urine into the fur-trapper's face.
Zeroes are nothing interesting. A dormant landscape's especially boring. This
ties in with the opening words on Money: "Zero...empty...space."
On the back cover of One Size Fits All,
"Round things are boring" appears as one of many messages bordering a circular
star map, indicating the boredom of the confinement of such a limitless place
that "fits all" as the universe to a convenient, measureable shape to
accommodate our filtered minds. But the statement also refers to the little
drawings at the bottom of the illustration: Ants bore into the "earth's crust"
(mentioned in 1971's onstage tale "Billy the Mountain," heard on 1972's Just
Another Band From L.A.) and the buildingscape of our toy-like urban living
environment. Self-important humans' actual irrelevance is revealed by nature;
along with Billy the Mountain, consider the earthquake on said back cover,
sending other buildings tumbling into the void. The ants (round things) are
boring into the flimsy base that's been set up for us. From the way the bugs are
tearing up the cheap-looking city, it would appear that a round thing -- we're
back to the record -- is boring into the trained viewpoints in our society and
the musical mainstream, causing damage to conformity.
It's something of a paradox that companies
which manufacture and distribute this art form (strictly for profit) might one
day be changed or controlled by young people who were motivated to action by the
products these companies
sell. (FZ, in his
1968 essay "The New Rock" -- Thanks to Zappologist Joe Palmer)
The music's reducing the dictators to bugs'
meat right before your very ears whether you notice it or not as you play the
record.
Many bits of conceptual continuity are
deliberately double-edged (or, as in this case, multi-edged); therein lies half
its fun and one aspect of Zappa's brilliance. The compact disc is a more recent
side-player in conceptual continuity, since we've returned to a round product,
the obsolescence of vinyl records being immaterial due to the still-applicable
concepts of roundness and revolution.
The unanticipated conclusion to Lumpy
Gravy is now relatively hilarious. The instrumental precursor to "Take Your
Clothes Off When You Dance" (a song lyricized on Money with the naive
idea that eventually, no one will have to worry about his appearance -- a slight
tie-in to the future title of One Size Fits All) leaps into the speakers
in full-arrangement form, including the orchestra, keyboards and Ventures-type
guitar lines. The music is again sped up. The cyclic melody is a blatant round
thing. Frank had this song, probably without lyrics, since 1961 (its original
version from Studio Z can be heard on The Lost Episodes). The song slams
Zappa's sarcasm home most effectively after such attractively unorthodox
orchestral music and such a quiet, disturbing ending. It dumps us back into
society to decide on it as we may -- and wonder if we're inside our own pianos.
We're Only In It For the Money
By mid-1967, Frank had the Mothers'
correspondence with fans worked out. A standardized letter was sent to each of
the 300-odd people who'd written to the group since the release of Freak
Out!. It constituted an initial reply and information about how to join the
fan club. A second letter was sent to those who joined.
The first, before being edited to exclude the
sexual references (there was some legal reason for this), read:
We could have sent you a cheesy form letter,
all "The Mothers of Invention want to thank you blah blah for writing such a
nifty letter blah and they love their fans who are so loyal and thoughtful blah
and blah. But they are so busybusybusybusy that it would be virtually impossible
for them to even begin to attempt to consider the possibility of any sort of
warm personal reply, blah, blah, blaaahhh." We could have sent you that sort of
cheesy letter; instead, we have sent you this cheesy letter, the text of which
reads: "Dearest Wonderful and Perceptive
Person: The Mothers of Invention want to thank you blah blah for writing us such
a nifty letter, some of which you have written to us on toilet paper -- how
wonderfully original. Golly gee, we are so awful busy being thrown out of
restaurants and hotels in Montreal, ignored by taxis in New York -- have you had
that trouble too? It's getting |